On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Gael Varoquaux < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 10:43:45PM +0200, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > four in scikit-learn (plus two that don't > > look related), > > Yeah, some of these failures are due to numerical unstabilities in tests > (nasty ones, still fighting) and some simply to crappy code (HMMs are > hopeless :( ). > > Now, with regards to the actual failures induced by the new branch, it > took me a while to understand why they where happening, and now I realise > that we probably should have explicit coercions at these locations. > > So the failures in those cases is a good thing? Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
