On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Robert Kern <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 17:02, Charles R Harris > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Gael Varoquaux > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Ufuncs need work, but I have > >> the impression that your proposal is simply to solve the special case of > >> masked data in the ufunc by breaking the simple numpy array model. > > > > I wonder how much of the complication could be located in the dtype. > > What dtype? There are no new dtypes in this proposal. > > Not yet, there aren't. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
