On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Charles R Harris <[email protected] > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Matthew Brett <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Benjamin Root <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >> > Again, there are pros and cons either way and I see them very orthogonal >> and >> > complementary. >> >> That may be true, but I imagine only one of them will be implemented. >> >> @Mark - I don't have a clear idea whether you consider the nafloat64 >> option to be still in play as the first thing to be implemented >> (before array.mask). If it is, what kind of thing would persuade you >> either way? >> >> > Mark can speak for himself, but I think things are tending towards masks. > They have the advantage of one implementation for all data types, current > and future, and they are more flexible since the masked data can be actual > valid data that you just choose to ignore for experimental reasons. > These are all things I like about it too. > What might be helpful is a routine to import/export R files, but that > shouldn't be to difficult to implement. > There is another intern here who has started something along these lines. I'll tell him he should email the list too. ;) -Mark > > Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
