Also, I can see the motivation for wanting a voice meeting, but on the subject of keeping people in the loop, could we make sure that someone is taking notes on what happens, and that they get posted to the list?
-- Nathaniel On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Mark Wiebe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Wiebe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The missing data thread has gotten a bit heated, and after sitting down >> with Travis to discuss the issues a bit, we've concluded that it would be >> nice to do a call with everyone who's interested in the discussion with >> better communication bandwidth. There are lots of good ideas out there, and >> it is very easy for things to get lost when we're just emailing. Getting on >> the phone should provide a more effective way to ensure everyone is properly >> being heard. >> We're proposing to set up a GotoMeeting call at 4pm CST today. Please >> respond if you can make it and your level of interest. I've created a Doodle >> where you can indicate your availability if 4pm today is too short notice, >> and we should schedule for a different time: >> http://www.doodle.com/eu9k3xip47a6gnue > > I hope everyone had a great weekend. Thanks to all who filled in the doodle, > we have a unanimous winning time of 2PM central time today. I'll post with > details about how to connect to the call when that has been prepared. > Cheers, > Mark > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
