On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Olivier Delalleau <[email protected]> wrote:
> It'll work, it is equivalent to the suggestion I made in my previous post > with the f_inplace wrapper function (and it has the same drawback that numpy > will allocate temporary memory, which wouldn't be the case if f was working > in-place directly, by implementing it as "arr *= 2"). > > Note that you don't need to write x[:] * 2, you can write x * 2 directly. > Or even x *= 2 <snip> Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
