On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Alan G Isaac <alan.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/4/2011 1:43 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > I don't think there are 5 active developers, let alone 11. > > With hard work you might scrape together two or three. > > Having 5 or 11 people making decisions for the two or > > three actually doing the work isn't going to go over well. > > Very true! But you might consider including on any board > a developer or two from important projects that are very > NumPy dependent. (E.g., Matplotlib.) > > That's a good idea. > One other thing: how about starting with a "board" of 3 > and a rule that says any active developer can request to > join, that additions are determined by majority vote of > the existing board, and that having the board both small > and odd numbered is a priority? (Fixing the board size > in advance for a project we all hope will grow substantially > seems odd.) > > I'm thinking of a board for resolving technical conflicts. Involving more people for larger discussions about direction and coordination with other projects would be the right thing to do. I think that can mostly be left informal at the moment but having an official get together at an event might be useful. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
