On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Irving <irv...@naml.us> wrote:
> This may be the problem. Simple diffs are pleasant. I'm guessing > this code doesn't get a lot of testing. Glad it's there, though! > > Geoffrey > > diff --git a/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_type_resolution.c > b/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_type_resolution.c > index 0d6cf19..a93eda1 100644 > --- a/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_type_resolution.c > +++ b/numpy/core/src/umath/ufunc_type_resolution.c > @@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ linear_search_type_resolver(PyUFuncObject *self, > case -1: > return -1; > /* A loop was found */ > - case 1: > + case 0: > return 0; > } > } > > Heh. Can you verify that this fixes the problem? That function is only called once and its return value is passed up the chain, but the documented return values of that calling function are -1, 0. So the documentation needs to be changed if this is the right thing to do. Speaking of tests... I was wondering if you could be talked into putting together a simple user type for including in the tests? <snip> Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
