On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:53 AM, David Verelst <david.vere...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to assist on the website. Although I have not made any code > contributions to Numpy/SciPy (yet), I do follow the mailing lists and > try to keep up to date on the scientific python scene. However, I need > to hold my breath until the end of my wind tunnel test campaign mid > February.
Fantastic, thanks. I think the ideal setup would be to create a web team in the numpy org. so that this team can have permissions over the website repos (source and build). I don't belong to the org so I can't do it myself. > And I do like the sound of the gihub workflow as currently done by the > ipython team. Don't hesitate to ask us if you have any questions. In particular, it's important *not* to use gh-pages like they originally suggest, but instead like we do it in ipython: the build should be a separate repo altogether, not just a branch in the official source repo. Ours has the makefile targets and scripts already for that, let me know if any of it doesn't make sense. Cheers, f _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
