Den 7. mars 2012 kl. 00:43 skrev Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com>:
> > > I don't see generics as the main selling point of C++ for Numpy. What I > expect to be really useful is exception handling, smart pointers, and RIAA. > And maybe some carefule uses of classes and inheritance. Having a standard > inline keyword will be nice too. But I'm not a modern C++ guru, so I may have > missed a lot of things. > "RIAA is evil, RAII is not" ;-) Actually, Cython has all of those features too :-) I am not suggesting NumPy should use Cython in the core. However if it did, the main machinery would already be in the compiler (typed memory views) :-) Sturla _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
