On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Tim Cera <t...@cerazone.net> wrote: > I have been developing a set of pad functions to pad arrays in different > ways. Really close to having it accepted into numpy, but I want to revisit > an implementation issue that I have become worried about. Should these > functions be collected into a 'pad' namespace or put raw into np.lib? > > Do I really care about this? Not really since it isn't a utility issue, > but I contend that it would look better to pull these functions into their > own namespace. > > +1 one for a separate 'pad' or 'padding' namespace. Adding 10 functions to the main numpy namespace feels like too much.
Ralf Is there a consensus? > > The current pull request: > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/242 > > Kindest regards, > Tim > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
