> > Really you have to have this setup in order to run a fortran executable, > but the only thing that comes to mind is the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment > variable. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is a colon separated list of paths that is > searched for dynamic libraries by both regular programs and by Python.
Thanks for the suggestion! I added the library to LD_LIBRARY_PATH and that fixed it. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send NumPy-Discussion mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of NumPy-Discussion digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. physics simulation (Peter Plantinga) > 2. Re: physics simulation (Tim Cera) > 3. Re: YouTrack testbed (Travis Oliphant) > 4. Re: YouTrack testbed (william ratcliff) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:24:43 -0400 > From: Peter Plantinga <[email protected]> > Subject: [Numpy-discussion] physics simulation > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <caey-jdl+mycqgsuoh2fjltopqnotxkja8y4ch2k1jbzjbyu...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I'm trying to run a physics simulation on a cluster. The original program > is written in fortran, and highly parallelizable. Unfortunately, I've had a > bit of trouble getting f2py to work with the compiler I'm using (absoft > v.10.1). The cluster is running Linux v. 12. > > When I type just "f2py" I get the following error: > > > f2py > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/opt/absoft10.1/bin/f2py", line 20, in <module> > from numpy.f2py import main > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/numpy/__init__.py", line > 137, in <module> > import add_newdocs > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/numpy/add_newdocs.py", line > 9, in <module> > from numpy.lib import add_newdoc > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/numpy/lib/__init__.py", line > 13, in <module> > from polynomial import * > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/numpy/lib/polynomial.py", > line 17, in <module> > from numpy.linalg import eigvals, lstsq > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/numpy/linalg/__init__.py", > line 48, in <module> > from linalg import * > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/numpy/linalg/linalg.py", > line 23, in <module> > from numpy.linalg import lapack_lite > ImportError: libaf90math.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file > or directory > > It looks like f2py cannot find libaf90math.so, located in > /opt/absoft10.1/shlib. How can I tell f2py where af90math is? > > Thanks for the help! > Peter Plantinga > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20120412/6d1dfed3/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:54:50 -0400 > From: Tim Cera <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] physics simulation > To: Discussion of Numerical Python <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <CAO5s+D8PpuOhea4u-StF_o5ESXeckV71_MTGQ=OwbiGhbL77=w...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > > It looks like f2py cannot find libaf90math.so, located in > > /opt/absoft10.1/shlib. How can I tell f2py where af90math is? > > > Really you have to have this setup in order to run a fortran executable, > but the only thing that comes to mind is the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment > variable. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is a colon separated list of paths that is > searched for dynamic libraries by both regular programs and by Python. > > Use... > > env | grep LD_ > > to show you the existing LD_LIBRARY_PATH. To change/append depends on your > shell. > > Kindest regards, > Tim > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20120412/12138bcf/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:05:12 -0500 > From: Travis Oliphant <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed > To: Discussion of Numerical Python <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > This looks good. Maggie and Bryan are now setting up a Redmine instance > to try out how hard that is to administer. I have some experience with > Redmine and have liked what I've seen in the past. I think the user > experience that Ralf is providing feedback on is much more important than > how hard it is to administer. > > NumFocus will dedicate resources to administer the system. > > -Travis > > > > > On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:53 PM, David Cournapeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > Here some first impressions. > > > > > > The good: > > > - It's responsive! > > > - It remembers my preferences (view type, # of issues per page, etc.) > > > - Editing multiple issues with the command window is easy. > > > - Search and filter functionality is powerful > > > > > > The bad: > > > - Multiple projects are supported, but issues are then really mixed. > > > The way this works doesn't look very useful for combined admin of > > > numpy/scipy trackers. > > > - I haven't found a way yet to make versions and subsystems appear in > > > the one-line issue overview. > > > - Fixed issues are still shown by default. There are several open > > > issues filed against youtrack about this, with no reasonable answers. > > > - Plain text attachments (.txt, .diff, .patch) can't be viewed, only > > > downloaded. > > > - No direct VCS integration, only via Teamcity (not set up, so can't > > > evaluate). > > > - No useful default views as in Trac > > > (http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/report). > > > > Ralf, regarding some of the issues: > > > > Hi Bryan, thanks for looking into this. > > > > I think for numpy/scipy trackers, we could simply run separate instances > > of YouTrack for each. > > > > That would work. It does mean that there's no maintenance advantage over > using Trac here. > > > > Also we can certainly create some standard > > queries. It's a small pain not to have useful defaults, but it's only a > > one-time pain. :) > > > > That should help. > > > > Also, what kind of integration are you looking for with github? There > > does appear to be the ability to issue commands to youtrack through git > > commits, which does not depend on TeamCity, as best I can tell: > > > > http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/YTD3/GitHub+Integration > > http://blogs.jetbrains.com/youtrack/tag/github-integration/ > > > > I'm not sure this is what you were thinking about though. > > > > That does help. The other thing that's useful is to reference commits > (like commit:abcd123 in current Trac) and have them turned into links to > commits on Github. This is not a showstopper for me though. > > > > For the other issues, Maggie or I can try and see what we can find out > > about implementing them, or working around them, this week. > > > > I'd say that from the issues I mentioned, the biggest one is the > one-line view. So these two: > > > > - I haven't found a way yet to make versions and subsystems appear in > > the one-line issue overview. > > - Fixed issues are still shown by default. There are several open > > issues filed against youtrack about this, with no reasonable answers. > > > > Of course, we'd like to evaluate any other viable issue trackers as > > > > well. Do you have any suggestions for other systems besides YouTrack? > > > > David wrote up some issues (some of which I didn't check) with current > Trac and looked at Redmine before. He also mentioned Roundup. See > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/ImprovingIssueWorkflow > > > > Redmine does look good from a quick browse (better view, does display > diffs). It would be good to get the opinions of a few more people on this > topic. > > > > Redmine is "trac on RoR", but it solves two significant issues over trac: > > - mass edit (e.g. moving things to a new mileston is simple and doable > from the UI) > > - REST API by default, so that we can build simple command line tools > on top of it (this changed since I made the wiki page) > > > > It is a PITA to install, though, at least if you are not familiar with > ruby, and I heard it is hard to manage as well. > > > > Thanks, that's a clear description of pros and cons. It's also easy to > play with Redmine at demo.redmine.org. That site allows you to set up a > new project and try the admin interface. > > > > My current list of preferences is: > > > > 1. Redmine (if admin overhead is not unreasonable) > > 2. Trac with performance issues solved > > 3. Github > > 4. YouTrack > > 5. Trac with current performance > > > > Ralf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20120412/3b4b840c/attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:29:23 -0400 > From: william ratcliff <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] YouTrack testbed > To: Discussion of Numerical Python <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <caft3ydsxsdmdr+pyshyw_kq6uvmgpewojm5vpa85maewa6f...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Has anyone tried Rietveld, Gerrit, or Phabricator? > > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Travis Oliphant <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > This looks good. Maggie and Bryan are now setting up a Redmine instance > > to try out how hard that is to administer. I have some experience with > > Redmine and have liked what I've seen in the past. I think the user > > experience that Ralf is providing feedback on is much more important than > > how hard it is to administer. > > > > NumFocus will dedicate resources to administer the system. > > > > -Travis > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:53 PM, David Cournapeau <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Gommers < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Bryan Van de Ven <[email protected] > >wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 4/3/12 4:18 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > >>>> > Here some first impressions. > >>>> > > >>>> > The good: > >>>> > - It's responsive! > >>>> > - It remembers my preferences (view type, # of issues per page, > etc.) > >>>> > - Editing multiple issues with the command window is easy. > >>>> > - Search and filter functionality is powerful > >>>> > > >>>> > The bad: > >>>> > - Multiple projects are supported, but issues are then really mixed. > >>>> > The way this works doesn't look very useful for combined admin of > >>>> > numpy/scipy trackers. > >>>> > - I haven't found a way yet to make versions and subsystems appear > in > >>>> > the one-line issue overview. > >>>> > - Fixed issues are still shown by default. There are several open > >>>> > issues filed against youtrack about this, with no reasonable > answers. > >>>> > - Plain text attachments (.txt, .diff, .patch) can't be viewed, only > >>>> > downloaded. > >>>> > - No direct VCS integration, only via Teamcity (not set up, so can't > >>>> > evaluate). > >>>> > - No useful default views as in Trac > >>>> > (http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/report). > >>>> > >>>> Ralf, regarding some of the issues: > >>>> > >>> > >>> Hi Bryan, thanks for looking into this. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> I think for numpy/scipy trackers, we could simply run separate > instances > >>>> of YouTrack for each. > >>> > >>> > >>> That would work. It does mean that there's no maintenance advantage > over > >>> using Trac here. > >>> > >>> Also we can certainly create some standard > >>>> queries. It's a small pain not to have useful defaults, but it's only > a > >>>> one-time pain. :) > >>>> > >>> > >>> That should help. > >>> > >>> > >>>> Also, what kind of integration are you looking for with github? There > >>>> does appear to be the ability to issue commands to youtrack through > git > >>>> commits, which does not depend on TeamCity, as best I can tell: > >>>> > >>>> http://confluence.jetbrains.net/display/YTD3/GitHub+Integration > >>>> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/youtrack/tag/github-integration/ > >>>> > >>>> I'm not sure this is what you were thinking about though. > >>>> > >>> > >>> That does help. The other thing that's useful is to reference commits > >>> (like commit:abcd123 in current Trac) and have them turned into links > to > >>> commits on Github. This is not a showstopper for me though. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> For the other issues, Maggie or I can try and see what we can find out > >>>> about implementing them, or working around them, this week. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'd say that from the issues I mentioned, the biggest one is the > >>> one-line view. So these two: > >>> > >>> - I haven't found a way yet to make versions and subsystems appear in > >>> the one-line issue overview. > >>> - Fixed issues are still shown by default. There are several open > >>> issues filed against youtrack about this, with no reasonable > >>> answers. > >>> > >>> > >>>> Of course, we'd like to evaluate any other viable issue trackers as > >>>> > >>>> well. Do you have any suggestions for other systems besides YouTrack? > >>>> > >>> > >>> David wrote up some issues (some of which I didn't check) with current > >>> Trac and looked at Redmine before. He also mentioned Roundup. See > >>> http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/ImprovingIssueWorkflow > >>> > >>> Redmine does look good from a quick browse (better view, does display > >>> diffs). It would be good to get the opinions of a few more people on > this > >>> topic. > >>> > >> > >> Redmine is "trac on RoR", but it solves two significant issues over > trac: > >> - mass edit (e.g. moving things to a new mileston is simple and doable > >> from the UI) > >> - REST API by default, so that we can build simple command line tools > >> on top of it (this changed since I made the wiki page) > >> > >> It is a PITA to install, though, at least if you are not familiar with > >> ruby, and I heard it is hard to manage as well. > >> > > > > Thanks, that's a clear description of pros and cons. It's also easy to > > play with Redmine at demo.redmine.org. That site allows you to set up a > > new project and try the admin interface. > > > > My current list of preferences is: > > > > 1. Redmine (if admin overhead is not unreasonable) > > 2. Trac with performance issues solved > > 3. Github > > 4. YouTrack > > 5. Trac with current performance > > > > Ralf > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20120412/11c9aea6/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > End of NumPy-Discussion Digest, Vol 67, Issue 43 > ************************************************ >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
