Thanks for the reminder, Stefan and keeping us on track. It is very helpful to those trying to sort through the messages to keep the discussions to one subject per thread.
-Travis On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The advantage of nans, I suppose, is that they are in the hardware and so > > Why are we having a discussion on NAN's in a thread on consensus? > This is a strong indicator of the problem we're facing. > > Stéfan > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
