On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <tho...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current >> 1.7.x >> > branch and branch again after a code freeze. That way we can avoid the >> pain >> > and potential errors of backports. It is considered bad form to mess >> with >> > public repositories that way, so another option would be to rename the >> > branch, although I'm not sure how well that would work. Suggestions? >> >> I might be mistaken, but if the branch is merged into master (even if >> that merge makes no changes), I think it's safe to delete it at that >> point (and recreate it at a later date with the same name) with >> regards to remote repositories. It should be fairly easy to test. >> >> > Looking at the log, the only commits I see are the release notes and a > backport of bento build fixes. I think it is safe to delete the branch. > I think Ray is right, it needs to be merged back into master. If you just delete it you'll create an issue for people tracking the 1.7.x branch. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
