That reminds me. How many NumPy devs are going to be at SciPy this year? It would be good to have a NumPy sprint there. Ideas for what we could work on:
1) Make progress on the 1.7.0 release 2) Make progress on the conversion to Github 3) Make progress against tickets and PRs If enough NumPy devs will be there, we should plan to have a BOF as well. Best, -Travis On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mike Ressler <[email protected]> > wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Charles R Harris > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was thinking of adding quickselect, but if you have made a start ... go > > for it. > > This is territory where I personally am fearful to tread - I'm no > developer, but I am an awfully good alpha/beta tester! I can go back > to the archives and try to see how far people got and what it would > take to finish it. > > If you have a good quickselect, I could wrap median around it and see > how it behaves. I am happy to help push things along, but frankly > would be embarrassed to have any low-level code I wrote see the light > of day. I can test and document it in exchange though. > > > It might be a good sprint for scipy2012 if any interested folks are going to > be there. I was going to do additional cleanups of the sorting functions in > any case. > > Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
