On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Travis Oliphant <tra...@continuum.io> wrote: > > I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today: > > * 326 -- inplace increment function
-1, for the reasons stated in the comment thread -- we shouldn't lock ourselves into an ugly API when there's discussion going on about the right solution, and the submitter has expressed interest in rewriting it in a better way. Also to be clear, I'm not saying I will try to block this functionality forever unless it's perfect or anything -- I could probably be convinced that putting in something sub-optimal here was the best trade-off. Really what I'm -1 on is shoving something in without proper discussion just because the release is happening, on the theory that we can clean up any mess later. Until your comment a few hours ago no-one even looked at this new API except me and the submitter... > * 325 -- prefer gfortran on OSX and Linux > * 192 -- meshgrid enhancements > * 327 -- restore commas and update C-API doc a bit Still needs a test. > * 352 -- simplifying case for insert and adding tests (#2028) > * 350 -- return view for subset of fields. > > Also, I would like to do > > * 356 -- with Charles's edited fix in the comments (Bug #808) Otherwise looks fine to me. -n _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion