On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Han Genuit wrote: > Also, considering that this behaviour already exists in past versions > of NumPy, namely 1.6,
I just checked: in numpy 1.6.1, the behaviour is to create an endless chain of base.base.base... In some sens, what Travis is proposing is going one step in the direction of the old behavior, without its major drawbacks. I am actually very favorable to his suggestion. My 2 cents, Gaël _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
