On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Peter Cock <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Anthony Scopatz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Fernando Perez <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Perhaps http://numfocus.org/ could take them on, or the PSF? > >> > (even if they don't have a specific use in mind immediately) > >> > For the short them I'd just have them redirect to www.scipy.org ;) > >> > >> I asked on the numfocus list and nobody was really interested, and I > >> floated the question at a board meeting and folks also agreed that > >> with the limited time/resources numfocus has right now, there were > >> more important things to do. > >> > >> So I'll just let them lapse, if anybody cares, they'll be open for the > >> taking come December 3 :) > > > > > > Gah! Sorry for missing this. I actually think that the redirection idea > is > > a really good one. > > It seems more worthwhile than just letting a domain squatter use it. > > > It can't be that expensive to just maintain these indefinitely. > > I'd rather us have them than someone else. I'll make a motion for this > > on the NumFOCUS list. > > The domain registration cost is minimal, and if NumFOCUS are > already looking after existing domains the extra admin should > be minimal. > > Could you keep us informed if the domains still need a home? > Yup, I'll be sure to keep everyone posted. > Might make a good domain name for a blog... hmm. > Thanks, > > Peter > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
