On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Lluís <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I haven't been able to find an answer after a quick search, but are there > any > plans regarding the (re)inclusion of missing data support into some future > version of numpy? > > Not at the moment, but it sits in the back of my mind. Mark's dynd work will include missing values at some point and I think we should see what that looks like. We also need to agree on how they should be interpreted.
They won't be in 1.8, too little time for that. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
