Hi, On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I still don't see why order is not a general concept, whether it >> refers to memory or indexing/iterating. > > I agree -- the ordering concept is the same, it's _what_ is being > ordered that's different. So I say we stick with 'C' and 'F' -- numpy > users will need to figure out what it means eventually in any case....
I'm not quite sure what you are arguing. I thought we all agreed that the index ordering idea is *orthogonal* to the memory layout idea? Not so? Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion