On 30 May 2013 13:44, Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought the topic of this article might be of interest here: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/julia-dev/GAdcYzmibyo >
>"I think Julia has great potential, and can, unlike Matlab, rid itself of its >tunnel vision on matrices and embrace tensors from the ground >up" Trying to discredit Matlab for tensors? I appreciate the enthusiasm but consider that there are high quality extensions before trying to discredit other people's work: http://www.sandia.gov/~tgkolda/TensorToolbox/index-2.5.html _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
