On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Eric Firing <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013/06/12 8:13 AM, Warren Weckesser wrote: > > That's why I suggested 'filledwith' (add the underscore if you like). > > This also allows a corresponding masked implementation, 'ma.filledwith', > > without clobbering the existing 'ma.filled'. > > Consensus on np.filled? absolutely not, you do not have a consensus. > > np.filledwith or filled_with: fine with me, maybe even with > everyone--let's see. I would prefer the underscore version. > +1 on np.filled_with. It's unique the meaning is extremely obvious. We do use np.ma.filled in astropy so a big -1 on deprecating that (which would then require doing numpy version checks to get the right method). Even when there is an NA dtype the numpy.ma users won't go away anytime soon. > > Eric > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
