On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:29:11AM -0400, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > I now see that the polynomial structure is intended to be "rich", as > opposed to the naïve function that I proposed. In the least, though, > the documentation could reflect the example you gave me. I could send > a patch that adds an example for each of the polynomial types in the > documentation, much like yours, if that would be useful.
Upon checking the latest numpy documentation, I found a hint for this here: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.polynomials.classes.html#other-polynomial-constructors The documentation, when read as a whole, looks clear. I was complaining earlier because I was referring to pre-1.7 documentation, and hadn't familiarized myself with the new polynomial interface as well. Sorry for the noise. I'll bother you the list again if I run into additional trouble. Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
