On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Charles R Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> So this petered off...any objections to np.full? >> > >> > >> > No objection. >> >> full full full >> >> np.full full of what? >> >> full of the number it's filledwith >> >> no objections so far, from what I remember of this thread >> >> we take an empty array, fill it and then it's "full" > > > You mean "fulled"? ;)
It's really "full", if you want to put something else in there, you need to replace something that is already in there. Fortunately, arrays are mutable and not "constant" (However np.empty doesn't give you an array that's really empty.) Josef > > <snip> > > Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
