On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Skipper Seabold wrote: > Not sure anyways if my direct numpy.mean application to pandas DataFrame > is > "kosher" -- initially I just assumed that any argument is asanyarray'ed > first > -- but I think here catching TypeError for those incompatible .mean's > would not > hurt either. �What do you think? �Similar logic applies to mean cousins > (var, > std, ...?) decorated around _methods implementations.
> Related? From a while ago. > [3]https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/160 yeah... That is how I thought "it is working", but I guess it was left without asanyarraying for additional flexibility/performance so any array-like object could be used, not just ndarray derived classes. -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Senior Research Associate, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
