On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles R Harris <[email protected] > wrote:
> New summary > > 1. 32 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC > 2. 64 bit windows, python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with MSVC, > linked with MKL > > These should be good for both windows 7 and window 8. > > Wait, when was it decided to move to MSVC for the official binaries ? Especially using ifort/MKL on windows means it will be difficult for other projects to produce packages on top of it. For Mac there is first the question of OS X versions, (10.5?), 10.6, 10.7, > 10.8. If 10.5 is omitted, packages built on 10.6 should be good for 10.7 > and 10.8, so > > 1. OS X 10.6 python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2, 3.3, compiled with native > compiler, linked with Accelerate. > > The main question seems to be distribution and coordination with scipy. I > was thinking we would link in MKL statically, which I think should be OK. > Christoph does that and it should decouple Numpy from Scipy. It may not be > the most efficient way to do things, but it would work. My impression is > that if we wanted to distribute a dynamic library then every user would > need an MKL license to use it. > > It would be good to get this settled soon as we can't afford to futz > around with this forever waiting to release Numpy 1.8 and Scipy 0.13. > > Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
