On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Henry Gomersall <h...@cantab.net> wrote:
> Yes, this didn't occur to me as an option, mostly because I'm keen for a > commercial FFTW license myself and it would gall me somewhat if I > couldn't gain the same benefit from my own code as others. > > So, given that, if anyone has an FFTW license and is keen for decent > Python wrappers, I'd be more than happy to discuss a sub-license to FFTW > in exchange for a more liberal (say MIT) license for pyFFTW. > OT, and IANAL, but I think what you'd want to do is dual-licence pyFFTW. Heck, you could even charge for a commercially-licenced version, as it would only be useful to folks that were already paying for a commercially-licenced FFTW -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception chris.bar...@noaa.gov
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
