Eelco Hoogendoorn <hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> writes: > That is good to know. The boost documentation makes it appear as if bjam is > the only way to build boost.python, but good to see examples to the > contrary!
Quite. I really wish they would officially adopt something more sensible, but in the meantime, using alternatives isn't too hard :) Toby _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
