On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Chris Barker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:42 AM, faisal anees < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I am Mohammed Faisal Anees , a Computer Science student at IIIT- >> Hyderabad. I was going though the ideas page and I found "Improve Numpy >> datetime functionality" really interesting , >> > > It's great to have the interest! > > One trick is that I dont hink there is a consensus on what needs to be > done to "improve datetime". > > One thing that does need to be done is cleaning up time zone handling -- > and I think we ALMOST have consensus on how to do that (at least the quick > fix part). > > Take a look for threads on this list in the last year about "datetime64" > and this ticket: > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/3388 > > (and search for other datetime64 tickets...) > > Note that we are hoping to fix that for 1.9 -- anyone have a time scale > for that? Too soon for GSoC? > Yes too soon and no, unlikely to happen given that no one volunteered yet. So seeing a solid GSoC proposal would be good. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
