On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Charles R Harris <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Chris Barker <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Charles R Harris < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That would be helpful. Ralf does those now and I suspect he would >>> welcome the extra hands. The two sites for release builds are Sourceforge >>> and Pypi. I don't know if the wheels builds are good enough/accepted on >>> Pypi, >>> >> >> Would anyone decide that other than this group? >> >> >>> but if you would like permissions on Sourceforge we can extend them to >>> you. We have been trying to do releases for OSX 1.5, which needs a machine >>> running an obsolete OS, but perhaps we should consider dropping that in the >>> future. >>> >> >> Drop that baby! >> >> First, it's bit odd -- as I undertand it, the python.org builds support >> either 10.3.9 + or 10.6+. As 10.5 has not been supported for Apple for a >> couple years, and 10.6 is getting pretty darn long in the tooth, the only >> reason to support that older build is for PPC support - I wonder how many >> folks are still running PPCs? I thought I was one of the hold outs, and I >> dropped it over a year ago. I'd love to know if it is something that the >> community still needs to support. >> >> > Now that I look on sourceforge, I don't see any OS X 10.5 builds, they are > all 10.6+. So that bit of support seems to have dropped in reality, if not > officially. > > The last release to support earlier than that was 1.7.1, which supported 10.3 and that has 643 downloads total. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
