On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Aron Ahmadia <a...@ahmadia.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> The thread so far, it sounds like the consensus answer is "meh, >> whatever". So I'm thinking we should just drop @@ from the PEP, and if >> it turns out that this is a problem we can always revisit it in the >> ~3.6/3.7 timeframe. >> > > +1 from here. > +1 too. Absent *clear* enthusiasm and support for new syntax/operators, I think being conservative and slow is the right approach. Just having @ will give us data and experience with this space, and it may become clear after one more cycle that we really need/want @@, or not, as the case may be. But it's easier to add it later if we really need it than to remove it if it proves to be a bad idea, so +1 for moving slowly on this.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
