On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Andrew Dalke <[email protected]>wrote:
> In DSL space, that means @ could be used as the inverse of ** by those > who want to discard any ties to its use in numerics. Considering it > now, I agree this would indeed open up some design space. > > I don't see anything disastrously wrong for that in matrix/vector use, > though my intuition on this is very limited. I believe this gives > results like the "strong right" option, no? > It is not uncommon to have v**2 @ u in numerical code for a weighted sum of u with weights from v-squared. Under @ in the same line as **, this will be interpreted as v ** (2 @ u) and most likely be an error.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
