On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:49 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Alan G Isaac <alan.is...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The documentation of numpy.unique
>>>> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.unique.html
>>>> does not seem to promise that return_index=True will always index the
>>>> *first* occurrence of each unique item, which I believe is the current
>>>> behavior.
>>>>
>>>> A promise would be nice.
>>>> Is it intended?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yes, it is intended, although the required mergesort wasn't available
>>> for all types before numpy 1.7.
>>>
>>
>> Does this mean return_inverse works again for all cases, even with
>> return_index?
>>
>> I removed return_index from my code in statsmodels because I make
>> frequent use of return_inverse, which was broken. We don't have any
>> unittests in statsmodels anymore that use both return_xxx.
>>
>>
> I don't know, needs checking. Seems to work now with a simple trial array
> of integers.
>

my example from may 2012,  thread "1.6.2 no more unique for rows"
works fine on  python 3.3  numpy 1.7.1

>>> groups = np.random.randint(0,4,size=(10,2))
>>> groups_ = groups.view([('',groups.dtype)]*groups.shape[1]).flatten()
>>> uni, uni_idx, uni_inv = np.unique(groups_, return_index=True,
return_inverse=True)
>>> uni
array([(0, 2), (0, 3), (1, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2), (3, 2), (3, 3)],
      dtype=[('f0', '<i4'), ('f1', '<i4')])
>>> uni_inv
array([1, 6, 3, 4, 5, 3, 2, 5, 0, 2], dtype=int32)
>>> np.__version__
'1.7.1'

Thanks,

Josef


> Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to