MKL BLAS LAPACK has issues as well: http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-mkl-110-bug-fixes . In case of OpenBLAS or GOTOBLAS what precisly is the problem you identify as showstopper?
Regards Carl 2014-04-06 20:59 GMT+02:00 Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Sturla Molden <sturla.mol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Julian - do you have any opinion on using gotoBLAS instead of OpenBLAS > >> for the Windows binaries? > > > > That is basically OpenBLAS too, except with more bugs and no AVX support. > > I know that OpenBLAS is a fork of gotoBLAS2, but you said in another > thread that gotoBLAS2 was 'rock-solid'. If the bugs in gotoBLAS2 do > not in practice arise for default Windows builds, then it could be a > good option until OpenBLAS is more mature. > > Put another way - does anyone know what bugs in gotoBLAS2 do arise for > Windows / Intel builds? > > Cheers, > > Matthew > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
