Perhaps a bit of context might be useful? How is numpy_ufunc different from the ufuncs that we know and love? What are the known implications? What are the known shortcomings? Are there ABI and/or API concerns between 1.9 and 1.10?
Ben Root On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Charles R Harris <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi All, > > Julian has raised the question of including numpy_ufunc in numpy 1.9. I > don't feel strongly one way or the other, but it doesn't seem to be > finished yet and 1.10 might be a better place to work out the remaining > problems along with the astropy folks testing possible uses. > > Thoughts? > > Chuck > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
