On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Eelco Hoogendoorn <hoogendoorn.ee...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would argue to treat the None-False condition as an error. Indeed I agree > one might argue the correcr behavior is to 'shuffle' the singleton block of > data, which does nothing; but its more likely to come up as an unintended > error than as a natural outcome of parametrized behavior.
I'm interested to know why you think axis=None should raise an error if independent=False when independent=False is the default. What I mean is, if someone uses this function and wants axis=None (which seems not totally unusual), why force them to always type in the boilerplate independent=True to make it work? John Zwinck _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
