I think it is a good time to discuss/implement further correlate improvements. I kind of favor the mode=(tuple of integers) api for your proposed change. Concerning the C-API we probably need to add a new wrapper function but thats ok, the C-API does not need to be as nice as the python API as it has far less and typically more experienced users.
I also think its time we can remove the old_behavior flag which has been there since 1.4. Are there objections to that? Also on a side note, in 1.10 np.convolve/correlate has been significantly speed up if one of the sequences is less than 12 elements long. On 12/11/2014 09:54 AM, Pierre Haessig wrote: > As a side note, I've still in mind the proposal I made back in 2013 to > make np.correlate faster > > http://numpy-discussion.10968.n7.nabble.com/another-discussion-on-numpy-correlate-and-convolution-td32925.html > > The basic idea is to enable the user to select the exact range of lags > he wants. Unfortunately I didn't take the time to go further than the > specification above... > > best, > Pierre > > > Le 10/12/2014 21:40, Jose Guzman a écrit : >> Dear Pierre, >> >> thank you very much for your time to correct my notebook and to point me >> in the direction of my wrong lag estimation. It has been very useful! >> >> Best >> >> Jose >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
