On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2015 11:15 AM, "Paul Hobson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Charles R Harris < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Hobson <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I feel your pain. Making it worse, numpy.random.lognormal takes "mean" > and "sigma" as input. If there's ever a backwards incompatible release, I > hope these things will be cleared up. > >> > >> > >> There is a numpy 2.0 milestone ;) > >> > > > > Is it worth submitting PRs against the existing 2.X branch or is that so > far away that the can should be kicked down the road? > > Not sure what you mean by "the existing 2.X branch" (does such a thing > exist somewhere?), but yeah, don't submit PRs like that. Best case they'd > bit rot before we ever get around to 2.0, worst case 2.0 may never happen. > (What, you liked python 2 -> 3 so much you want to go through that again?) > It's been a while, but last time I build numpy from the master on github, numpy.__version__ came back as 2.dev or something like that. So I always assumed there was a 2.X branch. It's been a while since I've built numpy, but clearly I'm mistaken. -p
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
