On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Stephan Hoyer <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The most recent discussion about datetime64 was back in March and April of > last year: > > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2014-March/thread.html#69554 > > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2014-April/thread.html#69774 > > In addition to unfortunate timezone handling, datetime64 has a lot of bugs > -- so many that I don't bother reporting them. But if anyone ever plans on > working on them, I can certainly help to assemble a long list of the issues > (many of these are mentioned in the above threads). > > Unfortunately, though I would love to see datetime64 fixed, I'm not really > a suitable mentor for this role (I don't know C), > Hi Stephan, thanks for at least considering to mentor. It's always possible to help out as a secondary mentor - even if you don't know C, you could provide valuable feedback because unlike most numpy devs you're actually *using* datetime64. Cheers, Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
