Yeah, I'm not arguing, I'm just curious about your reasoning. That explains why not C++. Why would you want to do this in C and not Python?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Neil Girdhar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If you're going to C, is there a reason not to go to C++ and include the >> already-written Boost code? Otherwise, why not use Python? >> > > I think we have an explicit rule against C++, although I may be wrong. Not > sure how much of boost we would have to make part of numpy to use that, the > whole accumulators lib I'm guessing? Seems like an awful lot given what we > are after. > > Jaime > > -- > (\__/) > ( O.o) > ( > <) Este es Conejo. Copia a Conejo en tu firma y ayúdale en sus planes > de dominación mundial. > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
