On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Alexander Belopolsky <ndar...@mac.com> > wrote: > >> 1. Is there a simple expression using existing numpy functions that >> implements PEP 465 semantics for @? >> >> 2. Suppose I have a function that takes two vectors x and y, and a matrix >> M and returns x.dot(M.dot(y)). I would like to "vectorize" this function >> so that it works with x and y of any ndim >= 1 and M of any ndim >= 2 >> treating multi-dimensional x and y as arrays of vectors and M as an array >> of matrices (broadcasting as necessary). The result should be an array of >> xMy products. How would I achieve that using PEP 465's @? >> >> > If you are willing to run Python 3.5 (use 3.6.0a3, a4 crawls with the > bugs), you can use gh-5878 <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/5878>. > The override mechanisms are still in process in Nathaniel's PR, so that may > change. I'd welcome any feedback. > > Oops, make the 3.5.0a3. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
