One of the usecases that has sneaked in during the last few numpy versions is that object arrays contain numerical arrays where the shapes don't add up to a rectangular array.
I think that's the wrong way to dve that problem -- we really should have a "proper" ragged array implementation. But is is the easiest way at this point. For this, and other use-cases, special casing Numpy arrays stored in object arrays does make sense: "If this is s a Numpy array, pass the operation through." -CHB In those cases being able to apply numerical operations might be useful. But I'm +0 since I don't work with object arrays. Josef > -n > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
