On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Stephan Hoyer <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> > wrote: > >> Also -- I think we are at phase one of a (at least) two step process: >> >> 1) clean up datetime64 just enough that it is useful, and less >> error-prone -- i.e. have it not pretend to support anything other than >> naive datetimes. >> > > I agree with Chris. My intent with this work for now (for NumPy 1.11) is > simply to complete phase 1. > This is fine. Just be aware that *naive* datetimes will also have the PEP 495 "fold" attribute in Python 3.6. You are free to ignore it, but you will loose the ability to round-trip between naive stdlib datetimes and numpy.datetime64.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
