> > Is the interp fix in the google pipeline or do we need a workaround? >
Oooh, if someone is looking at changing interp, is there any chance that fp could be extended to take complex128 rather than just float values? I.e. so that I could write: >>> y = interp(mu, theta, m) rather than >>> y = interp(mu, theta, m.real) + 1.0j*interp(mu, theta, m.imag) which *sounds* like it might be simple and more (Num)pythonic. Peter _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
