On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 09.01.2016 12:52, Robert McGibbon wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I went ahead and tried to collect a list of all of the libraries that > > could be considered to constitute the "base" system for linux-64. The > > strategy I used was to leverage off the work done by the folks at > > Continuum by searching through their pre-compiled binaries > > from https://repo.continuum.io/pkgs/free/linux-64/ to find shared > > libraries that were dependened on (according to ldd) that were not > > accounted for by the declared dependencies that each package made known > > to the conda package manager. > > > > do those packages use ld --as-needed for linking? > there are a lot libraries in that list that I highly doubt are directly > used by the packages. > It is also a common problem when building packages without using a "clean" build environment, as it is too easy to pick up dependencies accidentally, especially for autotools-based packages (unless one uses pbuilder or similar tools). David
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
