On 2/18/2016 2:44 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
In a new function not named `linspace()`, I think that might be fine. I do 
occasionally want to swap between linear and logarithmic/geometric spacing 
based on a parameter, so this
doesn't violate the van Rossum Rule of Function Signatures.


Would such a new function correct the apparent mistake (?) of
`linspace` including the endpoint by default?
Or is the current API justified by its Matlab origins?
(Or have I missed the point altogether?)

If this query is annoying, please ignore it.  It is not meant to be.

Alan

_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to