I also think this is a good idea -- the generalized flip is much more numpythonic than the specialized 2d versions. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:36 AM Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz < jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If nothing else, this is a nice complement to the generalized `stack` > function. > > -Joe > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Eren Sezener <erenseze...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In PR #7346 we add a flip function that generalizes fliplr and flipud for > > arbitrary axes. > > > > flipud and fliplr reverse the elements of an array along axis=0 and > axis=1 > > respectively. The new flip function reverses the elements of an array > along > > any given axis. In case flip is called with axis=0 or axis=1, the > function > > is equivalent to flipud and fliplr respectively. > > > > A similar function is also available in MATLAB™. > > > > We use this function in PR #7347 to generalize the rot90 function to > rotate > > an arbitrary plane (defined by the axes argument) of a multidimensional > > array. By that we fix issue #6506. > > > > Because flip function introduces a new API, @shoyer asked us to consult > the > > mailing list. > > > > Any objection to adding the generalized flip function? > > > > Best regards, > > C. Eren Sezener & Denis Alevi > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
