Nice ideas! Most will probably be moved to the 3.0 project. Some implementation notes...
Range of DateTimes: Easy implementation, just like existing. All of these could be generic in the future. In general, supporting a variety of types is a goal. Range (Type, string, start, end) seems to stretch the notion of a range to mean something else. It also requires the test code to be intimately familiar with what the source is about to return. So... not sure on this one. I'd also like to add random strings matching certain specifications TBD. If we move a way from a string name for sources, the signatures would be changed accordingly. @Rechenelf: Don't go overboard on tags! Launchpad has great search capabilities, so finding "random" and "range" is quite easy. OTOH, tags are great where some logical categorization or judgement is overlaid on the bug list - e.g. feature, easy, gui. "Attribute" is a good one because there would be too many false positives using a search. Charlie On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Rechenelf <629...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Having parameterized tests is a very nice feature. Some additional > possibilities for the attributes are needed: > > Range with DateTime and Step as TimeSpan: Range (DateTime, DateTime, TimeSpan) > Range (long, long) without Step (implicitly 1) - or does this make conflicts > with Range (int, int)? > unsigned variants > Range (Type sourceType, string sourceName, int start, int end) might also be > nice. Than it is easy to use the same data for multiple tests, if sourceName > implements IList. (like ValueSourceAttribute) > Range (string sourceName, int start, int end) see above > > Random for long and float > unsigned variants > > ** Affects: nunitv2 > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > > ** Tags: attribute feature random range > > -- > Extension of Range and Random > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629496 > You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit > Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. > -- Extension of Range and Random https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework: New Bug description: Having parameterized tests is a very nice feature. Some additional possibilities for the attributes are needed: Range with DateTime and Step as TimeSpan: Range (DateTime, DateTime, TimeSpan) Range (long, long) without Step (implicitly 1) - or does this make conflicts with Range (int, int)? unsigned variants Range (Type sourceType, string sourceName, int start, int end) might also be nice. Than it is easy to use the same data for multiple tests, if sourceName implements IList. (like ValueSourceAttribute) Range (string sourceName, int start, int end) see above Random for long and float unsigned variants _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core Post to : nunit-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
