Public bug reported:
In many cases a bug is reported to a project along with the unit test.
The unit test needs to be integrated, but it may take some time before
it can be resolved. In this case, it isn't clear what its state should
be:
* If it is integrated as is, the unit test fails and causes the whole build to
fail. This hinders development on other features and bugs - it's hard to know
whether a red unit test represents a regression or just an unrelated open bug.
* [Ignore] seems like the current best solution, but is semantically unclear.
Tests can be [Ignore]d for many reasons (temporary breakage) and sometimes
remain that way for a long time.
A [KnownBug] mark would semantically handle this, and would effectively
create an "open bug list" within the test suite. It would also allow
GUIs to visually indicate the state as distinct from [Ignore].
If this seems like a good idea I'll be happy to submit a patch.
** Affects: nunitv2
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216854
Title:
Add a [KnownBug] attribute to tests
Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework:
New
Bug description:
In many cases a bug is reported to a project along with the unit test.
The unit test needs to be integrated, but it may take some time before
it can be resolved. In this case, it isn't clear what its state
should be:
* If it is integrated as is, the unit test fails and causes the whole build
to fail. This hinders development on other features and bugs - it's hard to
know whether a red unit test represents a regression or just an unrelated open
bug.
* [Ignore] seems like the current best solution, but is semantically unclear.
Tests can be [Ignore]d for many reasons (temporary breakage) and sometimes
remain that way for a long time.
A [KnownBug] mark would semantically handle this, and would
effectively create an "open bug list" within the test suite. It would
also allow GUIs to visually indicate the state as distinct from
[Ignore].
If this seems like a good idea I'll be happy to submit a patch.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunitv2/+bug/1216854/+subscriptions
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core
Post to : nunit-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
