>>Scott wrote: We are moving towards a full C++ implementation. There was a
>>thread where Gil described his efforts around the spatial pooler. There are
>>some other things that would need to be ported to C++ like part of the
>>temporal pooler, the encoders, and a CLA wrapper around the different pieces.
>> Would be great if you were interested in contributing to that David, let me
>>know and we can discuss.
Hi Scott,
Nice read that! I´m converting the entire Python code that is in "py" folder
which I believe that includes full CLA with SP and TP poolers and all encoders
(right?). The idea is that using C# at first moment I can debug it better
before moving to C++. I'm working hard on it. In 2 or 3 weeks, I believe that I
have a initial version which you could better analyse it.
I´ve read Gil´s post and I agree 100% with him and others. The closer to white
paper the easier to understand the algorithm since the CLA white paper is
itself the main documentation. Abstraction suggested by a member is very
important and I think we should do some refactoring in order to leave the
naming easier to understand (abbreviations for example are not recommended as
good pratices, except well know abbreviations). Furthermore, a update to C++11
would be a good shot.
Best, David
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
