Hi Hideaki,

Thanks for sharing that with us, it has the advantage that it is a very
significant optimisation of the SP, with the real bonus of having a strong
neurological basis. Local inhibition is carried out in this fashion in the
neocortex.

I have a couple of questions/comments.

In your presentation, you're showing comparisons with the global inhibition
strategy, rather than the old local strategy. Your example application is a
vision system. Does your connection mapping (pixels to columns) embody
strong topology? In other words, do the neighbouring columns of a candidate
column overlap its retinal location?

The global inhibition strategy does not perform (semantically) as well as
the old local one when the connection mapping (and the data) is topological
and the task is truly spatial patterns. NuPIC uses global and
non-topological mappings currently because it's optimised for scalar and
category data, for which the global inhibition is a (non-biological)
optimisation. Global works better because neighbours in the region are
meaningless semantically, and the input-column connections are randomly
assigned.

The old local inhibition strategy is really a divide-and-conquer strategy
which replaces the global region with a number of sub-regions and performs
the global algorithm on each in parallel. Your method seems to match more
closely the natural algorithm, which must always be utterly local at all
times (ie there is no control program in the neocortex, each column reacts
autonomously to its local environment).

In order to incorporate your innovation into NuPIC, we'll need to have a
development activity aimed at resurrecting the vision (or other spatial)
architecture which has been moribund for some time. The SP would have to
have a switch or mode allowing a topological bias for columns and pixels
(or other spatial "locations"), and the "local inhibition" strategy would
also be switchable.

I'm pretty sure that any real vision or spatial applications would, in
addition, require hierarchy to be added to NuPIC in order to be useful.
Otherwise we would just have another perceptron, albeit with added
complexity and a better biological justification. The now very old demo
vision program shows that even a simple hierarchy can achieve apparently
impressive results, but again this did not use the real CLA (as we
currently know it) and it did not operate in the manner we believe the
neocortex works.

Regards,

Fergal Byrne




On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Marek Otahal <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks a lot for sharing Hideaki!
>
> on a quick glance, those results are impressive!
> How did you do the models (matlab or something?), will you be planning to
> implement the feature to NuPIC code?
> Either way, please fill in an issue request at JIRA with the slides
> included.
>
> Thanks a lot for your work, Mark
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Hideaki Suzuki <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wrote a ppt to summarize one topic I did in my study of SP.
>> I have a few other topics with SP, but I'm shifting to TP.
>>
>> The idea speeds up the local inhibition x20 or better without parallelism
>> (6ms -> 0.3ms in my PC).  As learning in SP proceeds, it will even get
>> close to the speed of global inhibition.
>>
>>
>> I'm sending this just because I don't want to be a free rider.  Whatever
>> I feel it might be useful for someone, I like to share it.  So, please
>> don't get offended because this is not so much biological (but software
>> engineering stuff).
>>
>> I hope this kind of mail is okay in this mailing list...
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>     Hideaki Suzuki.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nupic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Marek Otahal :o)
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>


-- 

Fergal Byrne

ExamSupport/StudyHub [email protected] http://www.examsupport.ie
Dublin in Bits [email protected] http://www.inbits.com +353 83
4214179
Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to